Animal Welfare Is Becoming Part of Destination Competitiveness
Author: Carol Kline & Callie Friedman
Published: July 29, 2026
ESTIMATED READING TIME: 6 MINUTES
This blog series was written in two parts - one for a traveling public audience and the other for tourism operators. The version below is for tourism operators.
Free-roaming dogs and cats are not simply a problem to be solved but a part of the social, ecological, and tourism systems whose impacts depend largely on human management and community relationships. Visitors care about both animal welfare and personal safety, and their perceptions are shaped by the health, care, and management of these free-roaming animals. Many are community or village animals rather than abandoned strays, and when destinations show compassion and responsible oversight, it can transform them into positive components of destination identity. Increasingly, tourism itself is viewed not as affected by free-roaming animals but as a powerful tool for supporting animal welfare through education, advocacy, volunteerism, fundraising, and responsible destination management.
Drawing on traveler guides, public health guidance, nonprofit resources, tourism surveys, academic research, and case studies from destinations including Bhutan, Mexico, Turkey, Samoa, Japan, Spain, Chile, India, and Australia, several consistent themes emerge regarding the relationship between free-roaming dogs and cats, tourism, and destination management.
1. Free-roaming animals are simultaneously an animal welfare, tourism, public health, conservation, and community issue
Free-roaming dogs and cats are far more than an animal welfare concern. Their presence influences visitor experiences, shapes destination image and reputation, affects public health and biodiversity, and impacts local communities and businesses. As a result, managing interactions between people and free-roaming animals has become an increasingly important component of responsible tourism planning. These animals should be considered part of the broader tourism system because their welfare and management directly affect both residents and visitors.
2. Tourists care about both their own safety and animal welfare
Visitors' reactions are driven by a combination of personal safety concerns and emotional responses to animal welfare. They frequently express distress when they encounter animals that appear sick, injured, starving, abused, or neglected while also worrying about bites, rabies, parasites, or aggressive behavior. Witnessing poor animal welfare can negatively affect visitor satisfaction just as much as direct safety risks. Conversely, healthy, relaxed, and visibly cared for animals often evoke positive emotions and contribute to memorable travel experiences.
3. The condition and management of free-roaming animals matter more than their mere presence
Tourists do not necessarily object to free-roaming animals themselves. Instead, visitor perceptions depend largely on the animals' physical condition, their behavior toward people, visible evidence of community care, the cleanliness of public spaces, and whether humane management programs such as sterilization and vaccination are evident. In destinations where free-roaming animals are healthy and well managed, they often become valued elements of local identity rather than tourism liabilities.
4. Many free-roaming animals are community or village animals not abandoned strays
Tourists may sometimes assume that roaming dogs or cats are homeless or in need of rescue. In many destinations, free-roaming animals are loosely associated with households or neighborhoods, receive food and care from multiple community members, or function as community or village animals while occupying culturally accepted social roles. Tourists from countries where roaming animals are uncommon may incorrectly interpret these animals as abandoned or neglected. Therefore, it is everyone’s responsibility in the tourism industry to help visitors understand the local cultural context in order to prevent unnecessary intervention by well-meaning travelers.
5. Cultural context strongly shapes perceptions
Attitudes toward free-roaming animals vary considerably across societies and among tourists themselves. Visitors from countries where companion animals are typically confined or highly regulated may perceive roaming dogs and cats negatively, whereas local residents often view them as normal components of everyday life. Tourist reactions may reflect broader expectations that destinations conform to visitors’ own cultural norms rather than objective assessments of animal welfare. This makes culturally sensitive visitor education especially important. Destinations should provide clear, accessible messaging that helps visitors understand local contexts and different approaches to human–animal relationships without shaming them for their initial reactions or assumptions.
6. Nighttime behavior and noise are significant tourism issues
Tourists often perceive free-roaming dogs differently during the day and at night. While dogs may appear harmless or friendly during daylight hours, they are frequently viewed as more intimidating after dark when they gather in groups, bark extensively, and appear more territorial. Noise pollution, such as persistent nighttime barking, can disrupt sleep, negatively affecting tourism experiences separate from physical safety concerns.
7. Tourists increasingly support humane management approaches
The majority of visitors strongly favor humane, non-lethal management strategies. Sterilization, vaccination, adoption, responsible ownership, registration, veterinary care, community education, and improved waste management consistently receive broad public support. Conversely, poisoning, indiscriminate culling, and mass killing receive little support from tourists and may damage a destination's reputation. However, technical interventions alone are unlikely to succeed without community participation and cultural acceptance. Effective management requires collaboration among governments, municipalities, tourism businesses, animal welfare organizations, veterinary professionals, conservation groups, local residents, and travelers.
8. Free-roaming animals also present conservation challenges
The presence of free-roaming animals can affect biodiversity and conservation outcomes through predation on wildlife, disturbance in protected areas, disease transmission, and interactions with endangered species. These impacts can occur in both rural and urban environments. For example, free-roaming dogs or cats living near a protected area may prey on native wildlife or transmit disease to endangered species, while their presence may be linked to human behaviors and systems such as animal abandonment, irresponsible ownership, inadequate waste management, or poorly managed feeding practices. Consequently, conservation efforts that focus solely on controlling free-roaming animals may address symptoms without addressing the underlying causes. Achieving meaningful conservation outcomes requires integrated approaches that address both human behavior and animal management, while recognizing the welfare needs of free-roaming animals and protecting native wildlife and ecosystems.
9. Tourism can become part of the solution
Tourism should move beyond simply minimizing harm and instead actively contribute to improving animal welfare. Ethical volunteer tourism, shelter dog walking programs, rescue tourism, educational experiences, advocacy campaigns, digital storytelling, ambassador programs, and visitor donation opportunities all demonstrate how tourism can support humane management. Visitors might contribute financially or participate in meaningful activities when clear opportunities are available.
10. Education before, during, and after travel is critical
Manage visitor expectations through ongoing education. Providing travelers with pre-arrival information about local free-roaming animal populations, practical safety guidance, cultural context, explanations of local management systems, and opportunities to support responsible initiatives can improve visitor understanding, encourage appropriate interactions, and reduce negative perceptions.
References
Abe, Y. (2013). Preserving culture or destination branding?: World Heritage status for Tana Toraja. In CAUTHE 2013 Conference Proceedings: Tourism and Global Change: On the Edge of Something Big.
Arluke, A., & Atema, K. N. (2015). Roaming dogs. In A. Arluke & C. R. Sanders (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of human-animal studies. Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199927142.013.9
Beckman, M., Hill, K. E., Farnworth, M. J., Bolwell, C. F., Bridges, J., & Acke, E. (2014). Tourists' perceptions of the free-roaming dog population in Samoa. Animals, 4(4), 599–611. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani4040599
Blaer, M. (2022): Animal rescue tourism: digital technology-enhanced approaches to support voluntourist engagement, animal welfare and rights. Tourism Recreation Research. https://doi.org/10.1080/02508281.2022.2046991
Cats and Dogs International. (n.d.). Tourist's Guide to Helping Stray Cats and Dogs While on Vacation. https://www.catsanddogsinternational.org/tourist-guide
Central California Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals. (November 9, 2024). Encounter a roaming dog? Stay safe with these tips! https://ccspca.com/blog-spca/encounter-a-roaming-dog-stay-safe-with-these-tips/
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. (n.d.). Travelers' Health: Avoid Animals. https://wwwnc.cdc.gov/travel/page/be-safe-around-animals
Chen, L.-H. (2024). Free-roaming animals as stakeholders in responsible tourism development: A commentary. Journal of Responsible Tourism Management, 4(2), 76–82. https://doi.org/10.47263/JRTM.04-02-05
Chen, L.-H., Ebron, J., & Nguyen, P. (2025). Reconceptualize Free-Roaming Animals in Tourism Systems: A Dual-Lens Actor Framework. Tourism Review International, 29, 325–341. https://doi.org/10.3727/194344225X17315216889096
Faunalytics. (February 21, 2014). Research By CANDi And Faunalytics On The Impact Of Stray Cats And Dogs On Tourism. https://faunalytics.org/the-impact-of-stray-cats-and-dogs-on-tourism/
Faunalytics. (2023). Tourism and free-ranging dogs: A risky combination. https://faunalytics.org/tourism-and-free-ranging-dogs-a-risky-combination/
Four Paws USA. (June 6, 2025). Staying safe around street dogs. https://www.fourpawsusa.org/our-stories/publications-guides/staying-safe-around-street-dogs
Global Rescue. (2018). Advice for travelers: Beware of stray animals. https://www.globalrescue.com/common/blog/detail/advice-for-travelers-beware-of-stray-animals/
Hill, K. (2024). Humano-cat cultures and tourist attitudes towards local free-living cats of the Costa del Sol. In J.Hooper & C.Kline (eds) Emerging Voices for Animals in Tourism. CABI. https://doi.org/10.1079/9781800625259.0009
Kangas, C. (2014, Sept 14). The impact of stray dogs on tourism in the Caribbean. HuffPost. https://www.huffpost.com/entry/stray-dogs-impact-on-tour_b_5575367
Kulakoğlu Dilek, N., & Dilek, S. E. (2024). Tourists' perceptions towards stray/free-roaming animals (FRA): The case of İzmir, Turkey. World Leisure Journal, 66(4), 580–599. https://doi.org/10.1080/16078055.2024.2349681
Mameno, K., & Kubo, T. (2021). Tourist intentions to donate to non-lethal feral cat management at a potential natural World Heritage site in Japan. Human Dimensions of Wildlife, 26(2), 99–114. https://doi.org/10.1080/10871209.2020.1799265
Pet Project Rescue. (n.d.). 5 ways to help animals while traveling. https://petprojectrescue.com/5-ways-to-help-animals-while-traveling/
Ruiz Izaguirre, E. (2013). A village dog is not a stray: Human–dog interactions in coastal Mexico (Doctoral dissertation) Wageningen University.
Webster, D. (2013). The economic impact of stray cats and dogs at tourist destinations on the tourism industry. https://turismo-responsable.com/userfiles/The%20Economic%20Impact%20of%20Stray%20Cats%20and%20Dogs%20at%20Tourist%20Destinations%20on%20the%20Tourism%20Industry%20May%202013-2(1).pdf
Schüttler, E., & Jiménez, J. E. (2022). Are tourists facilitators of the movement of free-ranging dogs? Animals, 12(24), Article 3564. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani12243564
Strickland, P. C. (2015). It's a dog's life: International tourists' perceptions of the stray dog population of Bhutan. Journal of Arts and Humanities, 4(12), 12–25. https://doi.org/10.18533/journal.v4i12.856
Strickland, P. (2013). The roaming dogs of Bhutan. Friend or foe?.
Tully, P. & Carr, N. (2023) Stray domestic animals and tourism. Routledge Handbook of Trends and Issues in Tourism Sustainability, Planning and Development, Management, and Technology.
Responsible Tourism towards Animals. (n.d.). Stray dogs and cats. https://turismo-responsable.com/en/s95-stray-dogs-and-cats
Sachs, A. (2022, October 6). How travelers can help street cats and dogs responsibly. The Washington Post. https://www.washingtonpost.com/travel/2022/10/06/help-street-cats-dogs/
Williams, S. T., Newsome, D., Bremner-Harrison, S., & Hill, K. E. (2022). Tourism and free-ranging dogs: A risky combination. Animals, 12(23), 3364. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani12233364
